Well... it's lunchtime....

 

Completely bored out of my mind. I've been listening to a conversation going on infront of me for the last hour about kicking people's ass... oh, yeah, and we've had a new addition to the class... seems I'm not the only one these recent schedual changes are wreaking havoc on...

 

Well, I gues it's time for a intelegent thought...

 

Iv'e been thinking alot about dimmensions. Sounds wierd, I know, but there is a point to this... I remember reading in school about quantum tesseracts... I can't quite remember where I had read it, but the theory and thoughts stayed in my mind. The theory stated, quite purposfully, that a single field of dimensional mass could theoretically fold in upon itself to cause relative temporal instability. this instability may be limmited to a atom's length, or be the size of several large football fields. The fact of the matter is, that field is a portion of dimmensional fabric that exists in unto itself. This is a form of fabric in which a atomic and/or molecular structure would fail to be in sync with the rest of the universe, in applicable theory existing at one moment in one set of dimmensions and existing elsewhere in yet anther. Thus, the atomic movement would be instantaneous... that is, if I still remember it correctly.

 

What does that mean? This means that a properly maintained field would, in essesnce, give a slight scattering to any atomic matter which entered it by conventional means, almost like a meat grinder, as that set of atoms is now existing in not only one set of dimmensions at a time, but multiple, thereby losing all atomic cohesion while within the field.

 

The only problem is this theory leads to a few problems. Primarilly, the atomic structure when going from a tri-dimensional descriptor to a six dimensional descriptor(excuding the theoretical duplication of timelines), we have no idea how this atom is going to react, or if, in the multiplication of dimensions,  the atom will continue to exist at all.

 

The last, quite puzzling prospect of this theory is that it could be already happening as we speak.

 

Take the most recent(to my knowledge) observations of the atom. As far as science as porven to us, the atom is only in existance for part of the time. That means that reality itself, as we observe it, only exists part of the time! This "phazing", as it could be termed, has multiple meaqnings, going all the way from that the entirety of the universe is a universal fuigment, all the way to what we are seeing is a galactic frame rate. Both of these theories are puzzling, and, as I would hope, wrong.

 

What does this mean for the lay-man? This proof of existance/non-existace is something to ponder. It may add mystery and reserve to the battle of if god exists, or may be used as a tool in creationism vs. evolution.(I hope not.) In essence, it means that what we see is only part of the story, a mere brief scrape of the surface of what is really out there. For all our sakes, I hope we find out soon...

 

And that's my theoretical thought of the day. Now go away.

           -The Iron Wealse, Logisist